Counter Cyclical Program in Harrison County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 997
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Harrison County, Missouri totaled $2,992,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Roger E Lewis Trust | Bethany, MO 64424 | $4,956 |
142 | Treasure Farms Inc | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $4,887 |
143 | Jim F Alden Revocable Trust | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $4,860 |
144 | John F Seltman | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $4,821 |
145 | Tracy Eivins | Leon, IA 50144 | $4,751 |
146 | Kenneth Tanner | Tenafly, NJ 07670 | $4,750 |
147 | Donald A Robinson | Blythedale, MO 64426 | $4,750 |
148 | Larry Linthacum | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $4,733 |
149 | Kenneth And Catherine Ledgerwood | Blythedale, MO 64426 | $4,718 |
150 | Gray Family Farm Prtsp | Woolstock, IA 50599 | $4,680 |
151 | Jerry Blake | Eagleville, MO 64442 | $4,664 |
152 | B C Kokesh | Cainsville, MO 64632 | $4,650 |
153 | Michael Ward | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $4,601 |
154 | Donald R Green Trust | Pattonsburg, MO 64670 | $4,547 |
155 | Fenimore Farms Inc | Bethany, MO 64424 | $4,535 |
156 | William Linthacum | Bethany, MO 64424 | $4,531 |
157 | David Baker | Cainsville, MO 64632 | $4,511 |
158 | Norma Baker Revocable Trust | Cainsville, MO 64632 | $4,511 |
159 | Plh Family Limited Partnership II | Trenton, MO 64683 | $4,481 |
160 | Bill And Wilma Hall Trust | Bethany, MO 64424 | $4,446 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”