Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Holt County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 77
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Holt County, Missouri totaled $172,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dorothy M Ohlensehlen | Craig, MO 64437 | $3,500 |
22 | Sean G Marrs | Forest City, MO 64451 | $3,500 |
23 | Jane Brown Trust | Oregon, MO 64473 | $3,409 |
24 | Scott Wayne Gallagher | Maitland, MO 64466 | $3,222 |
25 | Holland Family Trust | San Diego, CA 92166 | $3,185 |
26 | Robert L Stiens | Kansas City, MO 64133 | $3,101 |
27 | Gale L Currie | Goodland, KS 67735 | $2,866 |
28 | Edward G Derr Trust | Saint Joseph, MO 64506 | $2,676 |
29 | Jay Griffith | Maitland, MO 64466 | $2,662 |
30 | Alvin Mullins | Oregon, MO 64473 | $2,572 |
31 | Kirby L Rosier Trust U/d/t Dated | Mound City, MO 64470 | $2,521 |
32 | E & E Enterprises | Forest City, MO 64451 | $2,359 |
33 | Dale Hunziger | Oregon, MO 64473 | $2,295 |
34 | John H Oppenlander Sr | Oregon, MO 64473 | $2,247 |
35 | Madge M Kee | Saint Joseph, MO 64506 | $2,185 |
36 | G & J Meadows Inc | Mound City, MO 64470 | $2,157 |
37 | Gary Kunkel | Oregon, MO 64473 | $2,054 |
38 | Russell Marrs | Forest City, MO 64451 | $2,016 |
39 | John & Effie Speas Memorial -6941 | Kansas City, MO 64121 | $1,883 |
40 | Victor E Speas Foundation 6941 | Kansas City, MO 64121 | $1,882 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”