Farm Subsidy information
Holt County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Holt County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,326
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Holt County, Missouri totaled $323,568,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | William E Stone | Forest City, MO 64451 | $606,229 |
82 | 4 B Farms LLC | Oregon, MO 64473 | $605,515 |
83 | Todd Binder | Table Rock, NE 68447 | $599,706 |
84 | Marcia E Binder | Saint Joseph, MO 64506 | $598,962 |
85 | Bales Trust - 6941 | Kansas City, MO 64121 | $593,855 |
86 | Stephen C Milne Farms Inc | Oregon, MO 64473 | $591,856 |
87 | Neal Thomas Prussman | Forest City, MO 64451 | $591,550 |
88 | Michael Dean Wright | Craig, MO 64437 | $583,479 |
89 | Donald K Holstine | Mound City, MO 64470 | $575,471 |
90 | Bryson Wade Meyer | Oregon, MO 64473 | $573,795 |
91 | L J Keithley And Sons Inc | Verdon, NE 68457 | $570,820 |
92 | Keithley Brothers Inc | Verdon, NE 68457 | $559,874 |
93 | Robert C Smock | Maitland, MO 64466 | $555,908 |
94 | Thomas Owen Cain | Oregon, MO 64473 | $551,923 |
95 | Hhwllc | Mound City, MO 64470 | $551,450 |
96 | Marion Lee Peters Revocable Trust | Corning, MO 64437 | $549,370 |
97 | Jonathan Lee Russell | Forest City, MO 64451 | $546,058 |
98 | Binder Agventure | Forest City, MO 64451 | $546,017 |
99 | William Frederick Heitman | Fairfax, MO 64446 | $544,732 |
100 | Gary L Heck | Mound City, MO 64470 | $540,797 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”