Counter Cyclical Program in Holt County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 849
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Holt County, Missouri totaled $6,847,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kurtz Farms Inc | Forest City, MO 64451 | $53,955 |
22 | Glen Henry Morris | Mound City, MO 64470 | $53,791 |
23 | Gerald Dean Wilson | Mound City, MO 64470 | $53,499 |
24 | H Theodore Trimmer | Maitland, MO 64466 | $53,313 |
25 | Agri Concerns Inc | Oregon, MO 64473 | $52,539 |
26 | Lyle Derr Farm Company | Forest City, MO 64451 | $50,499 |
27 | Bruce Bernard Biermann | Mound City, MO 64470 | $48,297 |
28 | Michael Eugene Gillis | Mound City, MO 64470 | $47,932 |
29 | Young Farms Inc | Mound City, MO 64470 | $47,831 |
30 | Marcia E Binder | Saint Joseph, MO 64506 | $45,421 |
31 | Michael K Binder | Saint Joseph, MO 64506 | $45,421 |
32 | Scheib Farms | Oregon, MO 64473 | $45,287 |
33 | Brett Aaron Derr | Forest City, MO 64451 | $44,607 |
34 | Schoonover Farms Inc | Fairfax, MO 64446 | $43,480 |
35 | Keithley Brothers Inc | Verdon, NE 68457 | $43,025 |
36 | Biermann Farms Inc | Craig, MO 64437 | $42,925 |
37 | Chris Eric Tubbs | Mound City, MO 64470 | $40,714 |
38 | Albert Larry Smith Revocable Trust | Maitland, MO 64466 | $39,693 |
39 | Scott Wayne Gallagher | Maitland, MO 64466 | $38,383 |
40 | Brian Andrew Tubbs | Bigelow, MO 64437 | $38,348 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”