Tobacco Transition Payment in Howard County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 109
Recipients of Tobacco Transition Payment from farms in Howard County, Missouri totaled $383,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Tobacco Transition Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Irma Carmack | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $2,233 |
42 | Helen Drummond | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $2,154 |
43 | Mike Meyer | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $1,796 |
44 | Marion Brand | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $1,749 |
45 | Forest Green Farms Inc | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $1,742 |
46 | Zachary Phillip Fuemmeler | Armstrong, MO 65230 | $1,733 |
47 | Steven Nation | Fayette, MO 65248 | $1,694 |
48 | Chad Sanders | Fayette, MO 65248 | $1,651 |
49 | Richard Olen Carmack | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $1,514 |
50 | James Henry Strodtman | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $1,479 |
51 | Carol L Stockhorst-westhues | Armstrong, MO 65230 | $1,459 |
52 | Leon F Hammons | Armstrong, MO 65230 | $1,389 |
53 | Josh Monnig | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $1,354 |
54 | Vaughn Cooper | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $1,347 |
55 | Wilma A King | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $1,302 |
56 | Bernice Woods | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $1,281 |
57 | Martha Ann Strodtman | Fayette, MO 65248 | $1,268 |
58 | Westhues Family Trust | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $1,223 |
59 | Michael Williams | Columbia, MO 65203 | $1,106 |
60 | Patricia A Boggs | Franklin, MO 65250 | $1,031 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”