Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Howard County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 243
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Howard County, Missouri totaled $449,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ronnie Arnold Baier | Armstrong, MO 65230 | $2,273 |
42 | Steven Tresslar | Armstrong, MO 65230 | $2,261 |
43 | Scott V Cooper | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $2,224 |
44 | Omer Allen Conrow | Franklin, MO 65250 | $2,222 |
45 | Leland Duane Snell Trust Dtd 6/29/2005 | Fayette, MO 65248 | $2,183 |
46 | Seth Belstle | Fayette, MO 65248 | $2,178 |
47 | William Verner | Armstrong, MO 65230 | $2,118 |
48 | Foxtail Farms Faithful Family Farming, Inc. | Higbee, MO 65257 | $2,094 |
49 | German Farm Enterprises LLC | Fayette, MO 65248 | $1,997 |
50 | Scott & Rodney Sanders | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $1,986 |
51 | Brad Kircher | New Franklin, MO 65274 | $1,947 |
52 | Walter Bart Fuhlage | Fayette, MO 65248 | $1,946 |
53 | James R Wilhoit | Fayette, MO 65248 | $1,937 |
54 | Sondra Conklin | Fayette, MO 65248 | $1,886 |
55 | Ohmer Kunkel Jr | Fayette, MO 65248 | $1,873 |
56 | R&d Carmack Farms LLC | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $1,865 |
57 | Wayne Vanderwert | Columbia, MO 65203 | $1,857 |
58 | Csf Family Farm | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $1,848 |
59 | Chris Duren | Fayette, MO 65248 | $1,813 |
60 | Steven J Diehls | Fayette, MO 65248 | $1,798 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”