Emergency Conservation Program in Howard County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 93
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Howard County, Missouri totaled $1,238,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | John Brengarth | Wooldridge, MO 65287 | $16,342 |
22 | Esther I Biesemeyer | New Franklin, MO 65274 | $16,314 |
23 | William M Maupin | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $14,385 |
24 | Otto Charles Frevert Jr Revocable | Fayette, MO 65248 | $11,055 |
25 | Charles Taylor Jr | Franklin, MO 65250 | $10,973 |
26 | Leona Shipp Rev Lvg Tr 2 | Franklin, MO 65250 | $10,000 |
27 | Brian Haskamp | New Franklin, MO 65274 | $9,573 |
28 | Sondra Conklin | Fayette, MO 65248 | $8,852 |
29 | Clarence Felten Jr | Fayette, MO 65248 | $8,032 |
30 | Roger Wittmeyer | Franklin, MO 65250 | $7,892 |
31 | Philip Wittmeyer | Franklin, MO 65250 | $7,888 |
32 | Sharon Wittmeyer | Franklin, MO 65250 | $7,888 |
33 | James Rose | Fayette, MO 65248 | $7,688 |
34 | Jerome - Jerome & Kathleen Thies Rev Tr Thies | Fayette, MO 65248 | $7,676 |
35 | Clay Mitchell Strodtman | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $7,007 |
36 | Emil Wilmsmeyer Trust C/o Hug0 Wi | Columbia, MO 65202 | $6,380 |
37 | Earl Ginter | Boonville, MO 65233 | $6,014 |
38 | James Eric Colvin | Franklin, MO 65250 | $5,423 |
39 | Gary Belstle | Fayette, MO 65248 | $5,370 |
40 | Larry Joseph Schler | Franklin, MO 65250 | $4,925 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”