Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Howell County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 739
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Howell County, Missouri totaled $1,332,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Jane Rogers | Pottersville, MO 65790 | $2,212 |
122 | Daniel Heath Guffey | Bakersfield, MO 65609 | $2,206 |
123 | Brett Wilbanks | West Plains, MO 65775 | $2,202 |
124 | Randall Schafer | West Plains, MO 65775 | $2,198 |
125 | , | $2,196 | |
126 | Kelley Cattle Company LLC | West Plains, MO 65775 | $2,192 |
127 | Craig Bennett | Willow Springs, MO 65793 | $2,183 |
128 | Steve Morris | West Plains, MO 65775 | $2,183 |
129 | Truman T Wiles | Willow Springs, MO 65793 | $2,178 |
130 | Kim Wake | Willow Springs, MO 65793 | $2,172 |
131 | Darrell Mahan | Pottersville, MO 65790 | $2,168 |
132 | Dusty Lee Clinton | Willow Springs, MO 65793 | $2,150 |
133 | Cory Butler | Koshkonong, MO 65692 | $2,139 |
134 | Bobbie Joe Mcclellan | Willow Springs, MO 65793 | $2,126 |
135 | Tony Friga | Pomona, MO 65789 | $2,123 |
136 | John Paul Doss | West Plains, MO 65775 | $2,087 |
137 | Chuck Thompson | Summersville, MO 65571 | $2,083 |
138 | Lealin Wake | Willow Springs, MO 65793 | $2,081 |
139 | Jason Poor | Pomona, MO 65789 | $2,078 |
140 | Scott Foster | Willow Springs, MO 65793 | $2,043 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”