Production Flexibility Program in Jefferson County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 132
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Jefferson County, Missouri totaled $780,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dwane Stark | Festus, MO 63028 | $7,709 |
22 | Gil Schroeder Sod Sales Inc | House Springs, MO 63051 | $7,124 |
23 | Wayne L Ott | De Soto, MO 63020 | $7,088 |
24 | Paul Edward Klossner | Cedar Hill, MO 63016 | $6,871 |
25 | William D Murphy | Pacific, MO 63069 | $5,464 |
26 | R & G Investment Co | Saint Louis, MO 63118 | $5,155 |
27 | Hug Farm Partnership | Saint Louis, MO 63102 | $4,024 |
28 | Gale-the Gale & Grac Powell | Millstadt, IL 62260 | $3,808 |
29 | David Bonacker | Cedar Hill, MO 63016 | $3,480 |
30 | Leonard J Haas | Eureka, MO 63025 | $3,448 |
31 | Dale Oetjen | Eureka, MO 63025 | $3,404 |
32 | Phil E Bradford | Festus, MO 63028 | $3,278 |
33 | Daniel Florian Naeger | Bloomsdale, MO 63627 | $3,170 |
34 | James Westfall | Hillsboro, MO 63050 | $3,054 |
35 | Allbee Brothers | Kirkwood, MO 63122 | $3,028 |
36 | Eli Donnell Farm | Urbandale, IA 50322 | $2,938 |
37 | Leo G Kidd | Hillsboro, MO 63050 | $2,696 |
38 | Dickinson Farms Inc | De Soto, MO 63020 | $2,693 |
39 | Darrell Callahan | Festus, MO 63028 | $2,605 |
40 | Harvey M Linhorst Living Trust | Cedar Hill, MO 63016 | $2,501 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”