Total Conservation Programs in Jefferson County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 65
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Jefferson County, Missouri totaled $669,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Pete Reando | De Soto, MO 63020 | $2,240 |
42 | Mark W Conner | Festus, MO 63028 | $2,191 |
43 | Bobby J Stewart | Saint Louis, MO 63125 | $2,077 |
44 | Robert G Phelps | Saint Charles, MO 63304 | $1,993 |
45 | Anna Mae Inserra | Saint Louis, MO 63101 | $1,808 |
46 | Stanley Bonacker | Cedar Hill, MO 63016 | $1,580 |
47 | Roop & Patterson LLC | De Soto, MO 63020 | $1,494 |
48 | Carl Haberstroh | De Soto, MO 63020 | $1,345 |
49 | Leo G Kidd | Hillsboro, MO 63050 | $1,311 |
50 | Jeanie Louise Stewart | Chesterfield, MO 63017 | $1,120 |
51 | Robert Steven Stewart | Richland, WA 99354 | $1,120 |
52 | Jeffrey Mourice Bonacker | Cedar Hill, MO 63016 | $1,091 |
53 | Herman Koch | De Soto, MO 63020 | $1,029 |
54 | David Bonacker | Cedar Hill, MO 63016 | $768 |
55 | Emil F Kuhn | Florissant, MO 63031 | $730 |
56 | Walter Helbig | Hillsboro, MO 63050 | $593 |
57 | Stephen L Levall | De Soto, MO 63020 | $543 |
58 | Danny J Dees | De Soto, MO 63020 | $478 |
59 | George E Kelley | De Soto, MO 63020 | $476 |
60 | Bonnie Cook | De Soto, MO 63020 | $466 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”