Total Commodity Programs in Knox County, Missouri, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 490
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Knox County, Missouri totaled $10,900,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | David Kirk Strange | Edina, MO 63537 | $67,348 |
42 | Steven Chadwick Miller | Knox City, MO 63446 | $65,873 |
43 | Mary Elizabeth Strange | Edina, MO 63537 | $65,867 |
44 | Tyson James Ausmus | Edina, MO 63537 | $65,837 |
45 | Kbrs Revocable Trust | Rutledge, MO 63563 | $65,798 |
46 | Jeffrey Dean Poor | Novelty, MO 63460 | $64,533 |
47 | Steven Watson Miller | Knox City, MO 63446 | $62,276 |
48 | Andrew Jordan Yoder | Novelty, MO 63460 | $61,067 |
49 | William L Miller | Knox City, MO 63446 | $59,038 |
50 | Misty L Miller | Knox City, MO 63446 | $59,038 |
51 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $57,745 |
52 | R Bailey Wilson And Jill D Wilson Living Trust | Baring, MO 63531 | $57,094 |
53 | Browning Farms Inc | Edina, MO 63537 | $56,478 |
54 | Mark L Mallett | Baring, MO 63531 | $54,361 |
55 | Daryl Lynn Burkholder | Baring, MO 63531 | $50,559 |
56 | John A Nagel | Edina, MO 63537 | $49,905 |
57 | John D Taylor | Kirksville, MO 63501 | $49,813 |
58 | Thomas Glennon Marra | Kirksville, MO 63501 | $49,656 |
59 | Donald J Golden | Newark, MO 63458 | $49,388 |
60 | Harlan R Burkholder | Baring, MO 63531 | $49,064 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”