Production Flexibility Program in Lewis County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 957
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Lewis County, Missouri totaled $11,182,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | James & Brenda Barkley Rev Trust | Canton, MO 63435 | $43,856 |
62 | Harold Edward Klocke | Maywood, MO 63454 | $43,838 |
63 | Brown Bros | La Grange, MO 63448 | $43,566 |
64 | Jennings Brothers | La Grange, MO 63448 | $43,520 |
65 | Dennis Briscoe | Williamstown, MO 63473 | $42,763 |
66 | William J Schroeder | Ewing, MO 63440 | $42,250 |
67 | Daggs Farm | Ewing, MO 63440 | $40,993 |
68 | Joseph Earl Cunningham | Quincy, IL 62305 | $40,559 |
69 | Dale Wayne Mccutchan | Monticello, MO 63457 | $40,409 |
70 | Grover Arnold Gamm | Ewing, MO 63440 | $40,204 |
71 | Ronald Bringer | La Grange, MO 63448 | $39,714 |
72 | James W & Mary Ann Lillard Trust | Williamstown, MO 63473 | $39,285 |
73 | Douglas Victor Daggs | Ewing, MO 63440 | $38,800 |
74 | Klataske & Penn Farm | Lewistown, MO 63452 | $37,890 |
75 | Don Grimwood | Monticello, MO 63457 | $37,839 |
76 | Frederick Benlohr Schlotter | Canton, MO 63435 | $37,799 |
77 | David Wurtzberger | La Belle, MO 63447 | $37,139 |
78 | Marvin Herman Althoff | Monticello, MO 63457 | $37,063 |
79 | Daniel Logsdon | La Grange, MO 63448 | $36,158 |
80 | Daniel George Warning | La Grange, MO 63448 | $36,146 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”