Conservation Reserve Program in Lincoln County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 142
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Lincoln County, Missouri totaled $413,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Lawrence Eddie Edmiston | Moscow Mills, MO 63362 | $1,151 |
82 | Jason Whittenburg | Troy, MO 63379 | $1,148 |
83 | Eugene Gregory Peasel | Silex, MO 63377 | $1,088 |
84 | Mmt Farms LLC | Salt Point, NY 12578 | $1,086 |
85 | William K Creech | Troy, MO 63379 | $1,053 |
86 | Roger A Creech | Troy, MO 63379 | $1,053 |
87 | Debra K Jones | Silex, MO 63377 | $1,051 |
88 | Lloyd Eugene & Martha Elizabeth Peasel Revocable T | Silex, MO 63377 | $1,042 |
89 | Creech Family Farm Legacy Trust | Chico, CA 95928 | $1,028 |
90 | David J Kaeser | Truxton, MO 63381 | $1,025 |
91 | William M And Barbara L Peasel Revocable Trust Dtd | Silex, MO 63377 | $947 |
92 | Brian J Dietsch | Saint Charles, MO 63303 | $879 |
93 | Timothy Gerald Stewart | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $824 |
94 | Allen L Eveland | Silex, MO 63377 | $806 |
95 | Marc A Eveland | Troy, MO 63379 | $806 |
96 | Caleb Rowland | Winfield, MO 63389 | $803 |
97 | Kermit Benjamin Christmann | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $796 |
98 | Burkemper Farms | Old Monroe, MO 63369 | $786 |
99 | John P Schnieders | Saint Peters, MO 63376 | $771 |
100 | Curtis Stille | Moscow Mills, MO 63362 | $757 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”