Farm Subsidy information
Lincoln County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Lincoln County, Missouri, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,195
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lincoln County, Missouri totaled $13,458,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Witt Farms LLC | Warrenton, MO 63383 | $286,444 |
| 2 | Rolf Farms | Winfield, MO 63389 | $256,260 |
| 3 | Ruether Bros & Sons Farms LLC | Hawk Point, MO 63349 | $188,878 |
| 4 | Verlyn Schulze LLC | Warrenton, MO 63383 | $158,626 |
| 5 | Twin Hill Stock Farm | Silex, MO 63377 | $157,260 |
| 6 | Burkemper Farms | Old Monroe, MO 63369 | $134,576 |
| 7 | Keeven Brothers Inc | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $128,976 |
| 8 | Ed Keeven Sod Company Inc | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $126,988 |
| 9 | Brakensiek Farm L L C | Wright City, MO 63390 | $123,069 |
| 10 | Boedeker Bros. Farm, Inc. | Elsberry, MO 63343 | $118,034 |
| 11 | Ross Brothers Farms LLC | Foley, MO 63347 | $113,243 |
| 12 | S & J Farms & Ranch LLC | Warrenton, MO 63383 | $111,070 |
| 13 | Meadowbrook Farm Inc | Elsberry, MO 63343 | $110,272 |
| 14 | Richard Joseph Heitman | Elsberry, MO 63343 | $109,582 |
| 15 | Patrick Burkemper | Elsberry, MO 63343 | $103,904 |
| 16 | Larry Dean Shramek | Silex, MO 63377 | $100,241 |
| 17 | Andrew Holmes | Truxton, MO 63381 | $96,990 |
| 18 | Mayes Farms Inc | Elsberry, MO 63343 | $93,904 |
| 19 | Jack Holt | Silex, MO 63377 | $92,568 |
| 20 | Steven R Plackemeier | Silex, MO 63377 | $91,927 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf