Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Lincoln County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 70
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Lincoln County, Missouri totaled $13,460 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Carl D Hines | Old Monroe, MO 63369 | $129 |
22 | Donald Humphrey Inc | Chesterfield, MO 63017 | $120 |
23 | James Anthony Nolan | Silex, MO 63377 | $113 |
24 | Willie Bricker Jr Rev Tr | Troy, MO 63379 | $105 |
25 | Ronald J Koch Revocable Living Tru | Moscow Mills, MO 63362 | $105 |
26 | James Michael Gittemeier | Hazelwood, MO 63042 | $104 |
27 | Merle S Burkemper Irrev Trust | Moscow Mills, MO 63362 | $104 |
28 | Norman Edward Twellman | Silex, MO 63377 | $97 |
29 | Betty Joyce Choate Rev Living Trust | Middletown, MO 63359 | $97 |
30 | Witt Farms LLC | Warrenton, MO 63383 | $84 |
31 | Richard Els | Silex, MO 63377 | $80 |
32 | Marilyn Norris | Troy, MO 63379 | $67 |
33 | Levi Horton Brown | Whiteside, MO 63387 | $65 |
34 | Thomas M Miller | Silex, MO 63377 | $58 |
35 | Eastern Missouri Beagle Club Inc | Saint Charles, MO 63303 | $56 |
36 | John L Reller | Old Monroe, MO 63369 | $54 |
37 | Ruth Hollander Rev Trust | Affton, MO 63123 | $54 |
38 | Douglas D Hollander | Saint Louis, MO 63123 | $54 |
39 | Franz Mayer | Augusta, MO 63332 | $52 |
40 | Glenn Harke | Silex, MO 63377 | $49 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”