Farm Subsidy information
Linn County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Linn County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 628
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Linn County, Missouri totaled $13,121,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Kyle R Paris | Meadville, MO 64659 | $28,651 |
62 | Murrell Enterprises LLC | Linneus, MO 64653 | $28,237 |
63 | Ott J Coulson | Saint Catharine, MO 64628 | $28,034 |
64 | Phyllis Kay Young | Humphreys, MO 64646 | $27,982 |
65 | Jeremy R Triplett | Linneus, MO 64653 | $27,501 |
66 | Thomas Mark Mcclamroch | Bucklin, MO 64631 | $27,122 |
67 | Gary Sattman | Pacific, MO 63069 | $26,770 |
68 | Clinton Wade Beall | Meadville, MO 64659 | $26,731 |
69 | Harold Lee Turner | Linneus, MO 64653 | $26,380 |
70 | Gerald Keith Ludwig | Browning, MO 64630 | $26,127 |
71 | Richard Homer Watsek | Godfrey, IL 62035 | $25,657 |
72 | Shawn Andrew Neal | Linneus, MO 64653 | $25,655 |
73 | James Faris Walker III | Marietta, GA 30062 | $25,116 |
74 | Lori Raithel | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $24,968 |
75 | John T Jesaitis | Laclede, MO 64651 | $24,938 |
76 | Raymond Ronald Phillips | New Boston, MO 63557 | $24,807 |
77 | Grafton Farms Inc | Laclede, MO 64651 | $24,663 |
78 | Joseph A Lovenduski | Brookfield, MO 64628 | $24,485 |
79 | Wayne Curtis Stockwell | Laclede, MO 64651 | $23,817 |
80 | Lloyd Grafton Inc | Laclede, MO 64651 | $23,746 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”