Conservation Reserve Program in Linn County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,852
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Linn County, Missouri totaled $117,420,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Gary L Kitchen | Bucklin, MO 64631 | $344,985 |
62 | Westfall Brothers L L C | Liberty, MO 64068 | $341,710 |
63 | Stringtown Real Estate Investors | Foristell, MO 63348 | $339,604 |
64 | Sharon Lee Young | Browning, MO 64630 | $335,419 |
65 | Charles M Lodder | Rothville, MO 64676 | $322,206 |
66 | William P Westfall Revocable Trus | Liberty, MO 64068 | $320,206 |
67 | Carlos Garry Amen | New Boston, MO 63557 | $314,354 |
68 | Harold G Roe | Laclede, MO 64651 | $313,661 |
69 | Gary Sattman | Pacific, MO 63069 | $310,404 |
70 | Russell A Falconer | Purdin, MO 64674 | $308,153 |
71 | Stephen D Falconer | Purdin, MO 64674 | $308,037 |
72 | Luman Offutt Farms Inc | Orrick, MO 64077 | $304,272 |
73 | Clifford & Audrey Ware Rev Trust | New Boston, MO 63557 | $303,507 |
74 | First Missouri Bank ** | Brookfield, MO 64628 | $300,701 |
75 | Donna E Miller | Purdin, MO 64674 | $297,484 |
76 | Melba Belzer | Winigan, MO 63566 | $295,746 |
77 | Cheryl Jean Butterfield | Linneus, MO 64653 | $295,213 |
78 | John C Mckenzie | Brookfield, MO 64628 | $293,497 |
79 | Jerry Lynn Main | Bucklin, MO 64631 | $293,207 |
80 | Terrill Don Lane | Saint Catharine, MO 64628 | $292,238 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”