Total Conservation Programs in Linn County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,896
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Linn County, Missouri totaled $117,873,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Burtch Farms Inc | Chula, MO 64635 | $992,514 |
2 | Lloyd Arnold Guilford | Meadville, MO 64659 | $983,712 |
3 | John R Miller II | Defiance, MO 63341 | $931,090 |
4 | Richard Maxwell Butterfield Jr | Linneus, MO 64653 | $870,885 |
5 | Lloyd Grafton Inc | Laclede, MO 64651 | $842,578 |
6 | Donald Robert Hoover | Saint Catharine, MO 64628 | $770,973 |
7 | Phyllis Kay Young | Humphreys, MO 64646 | $768,681 |
8 | Robert Rulon Rev Trust | Brookfield, MO 64628 | $761,319 |
9 | Douglas Stuver Black | Saint Catharine, MO 64628 | $742,619 |
10 | Jerome Lee Ward | Browning, MO 64630 | $731,898 |
11 | Larry Sattman Revocable Trust | Winigan, MO 63566 | $712,514 |
12 | James Faris Walker III | Marietta, GA 30062 | $683,408 |
13 | Stephen Paul Lambert | Brookfield, MO 64628 | $662,067 |
14 | John W Grice Trust Agreement | Moberly, MO 65270 | $620,619 |
15 | Carol Sayre | Purdin, MO 64674 | $602,421 |
16 | Raymond Ronald Phillips | New Boston, MO 63557 | $602,143 |
17 | James Randall Main | Bucklin, MO 64631 | $590,733 |
18 | Carl Sattman | Winigan, MO 63566 | $583,319 |
19 | Triplett Farms Inc | Linneus, MO 64653 | $569,914 |
20 | Ott J Coulson | Saint Catharine, MO 64628 | $568,776 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>