Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Livingston County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 357
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Livingston County, Missouri totaled $2,560,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Bernard Wayne Smith | Braymer, MO 64624 | $16,467 |
42 | Gaston Farms Inc | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $16,465 |
43 | Duane Crackenberger | Hale, MO 64643 | $16,265 |
44 | George F Roberts III- Roberts Family Trust 2 | Mooresville, MO 64664 | $15,814 |
45 | Gerald L Marrs | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $14,378 |
46 | , | $14,326 | |
47 | Hazel Hill Grain & Livestock Inc | Wheeling, MO 64688 | $13,709 |
48 | Scott Wayne Smith | Braymer, MO 64624 | $13,652 |
49 | Todd E Shiflett | Linneus, MO 64653 | $13,555 |
50 | J H Farms Inc | Dawn, MO 64638 | $12,957 |
51 | Matt Hopper | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $12,879 |
52 | Berniece Bonderer | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $12,829 |
53 | Rick Surber | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $12,807 |
54 | Todd E Jones | Dawn, MO 64638 | $12,778 |
55 | Douglas Peery Doughty | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $12,337 |
56 | Lois J Jones | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $12,272 |
57 | Michael Trager | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $12,125 |
58 | Todd Roberts | Mooresville, MO 64664 | $12,027 |
59 | Frank Stedem | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $11,936 |
60 | Dale Davenport | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $11,900 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”