Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Macon County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 178
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Macon County, Missouri totaled $350,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ricky Lynn Mcvicker | Bevier, MO 63532 | $17,179 |
2 | Kemper V Walker | Atlanta, MO 63530 | $6,000 |
3 | Larry D Phillips | Atlanta, MO 63530 | $5,996 |
4 | Ronnie Jackson | New Boston, MO 63557 | $5,335 |
5 | David Eitel | La Plata, MO 63549 | $5,138 |
6 | John Charles Hall | Callao, MO 63534 | $4,877 |
7 | Keith Wright | Excello, MO 65247 | $4,403 |
8 | William L Biegel | Callao, MO 63534 | $4,351 |
9 | James A Replogle | Atlanta, MO 63530 | $4,338 |
10 | Kenneth R Salsman | Macon, MO 63552 | $4,338 |
11 | George E Mitch | New Cambria, MO 63558 | $4,338 |
12 | Keith Kelso | New Cambria, MO 63558 | $4,338 |
13 | Mary C Liebhart Rev Trust | New Boston, MO 63557 | $4,338 |
14 | Randall Watson Rev Trust-watson Legacy Trust | Bevier, MO 63532 | $4,337 |
15 | Robert Wheeler | Atlanta, MO 63530 | $4,336 |
16 | Stephen A Sawyer | La Plata, MO 63549 | $4,334 |
17 | Larry Grinder | New Cambria, MO 63558 | $4,290 |
18 | Otha A Dowell Jr | New Cambria, MO 63558 | $4,268 |
19 | Leland W Malloy | Ethel, MO 63539 | $4,071 |
20 | David T James Jr | New Cambria, MO 63558 | $3,967 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>