Counter Cyclical Program in Macon County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 923
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Macon County, Missouri totaled $1,726,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | David A Chinn | Clarence, MO 63437 | $2,753 |
162 | Jody Ann Chinn | Clarence, MO 63437 | $2,753 |
163 | Charles R Watson | Atlanta, MO 63530 | $2,752 |
164 | Robert Lee Kemp | Clarence, MO 63437 | $2,727 |
165 | Clinton L Steele | La Plata, MO 63549 | $2,727 |
166 | Liebhart Family Trust | New Boston, MO 63557 | $2,723 |
167 | Wayne A Gatterman | Callao, MO 63534 | $2,718 |
168 | Grisham White | Macon, MO 63552 | $2,699 |
169 | Gary Belt | Atlanta, MO 63530 | $2,693 |
170 | Michael Russell Rowe | New Cambria, MO 63558 | $2,669 |
171 | Wayne Beeson | Atlanta, MO 63530 | $2,630 |
172 | Carol Mclin | Macon, MO 63552 | $2,607 |
173 | Howard Mccarty Jr Living Trust | Macon, MO 63552 | $2,586 |
174 | Maurine Romjue | Rutledge, MO 63563 | $2,558 |
175 | Bruce Boyd | New Cambria, MO 63558 | $2,535 |
176 | Paula J Thompson Family Trust | La Plata, MO 63549 | $2,491 |
177 | Kristin S Gall | New Cambria, MO 63558 | $2,486 |
178 | Keith Wright | Excello, MO 65247 | $2,467 |
179 | Nathan Shain Ford | Callao, MO 63534 | $2,390 |
180 | Corrine Mae Sinnock Revocable Tru | Antelope, CA 95843 | $2,379 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”