Emergency Conservation Program in Macon County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 158
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Macon County, Missouri totaled $407,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Richard D Mallett | Callao, MO 63534 | $3,892 |
22 | Benjamin T Coleman Rev Trust | Callao, MO 63534 | $3,712 |
23 | Dale Behrman | Bucklin, MO 64631 | $3,697 |
24 | Morris L Ratliff | New Boston, MO 63557 | $3,551 |
25 | Janie Lenzini | Bevier, MO 63532 | $3,337 |
26 | Ray Thomas Easley Jr | Elmer, MO 63538 | $3,290 |
27 | Wilhelmina Stuver | Overland Park, KS 66214 | $3,147 |
28 | Gary F Wiggins | New Cambria, MO 63558 | $3,099 |
29 | Paul Lozuaway | Bucklin, MO 64631 | $2,914 |
30 | Alvin Clark Jr And Joan Clark Co- | Ethel, MO 63539 | $2,859 |
31 | Ronnie Jackson | New Boston, MO 63557 | $2,824 |
32 | Larry L Gall | Bucklin, MO 64631 | $2,823 |
33 | Frank Pike | Elmer, MO 63538 | $2,687 |
34 | Harold Rice | Bucklin, MO 64631 | $2,620 |
35 | Kenneth R Salsman | Macon, MO 63552 | $2,462 |
36 | Calvin Gall | New Cambria, MO 63558 | $2,405 |
37 | Ricky Dean Grigsby | Elmer, MO 63538 | $2,380 |
38 | Jonathan David Cook | Callao, MO 63534 | $2,325 |
39 | Gary Belt | Atlanta, MO 63530 | $2,258 |
40 | Abeln Farms LLC | New Cambria, MO 63558 | $2,217 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”