Farm Subsidy information
Macon County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Macon County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,879
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Macon County, Missouri totaled $270,417,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Eric Allan Moots | Kirksville, MO 63501 | $2,454,557 |
2 | Larry Britt Farms Inc | Callao, MO 63534 | $1,720,612 |
3 | Rival Properties | New Cambria, MO 63558 | $1,714,793 |
4 | Timothy Fitzsimmons | Macon, MO 63552 | $1,630,622 |
5 | Kenneth R Salsman | Macon, MO 63552 | $1,611,021 |
6 | Britt Joint Venture | Woodstock, GA 30188 | $1,485,814 |
7 | Robert Mense | Atlanta, MO 63530 | $1,460,782 |
8 | Daniel J Smithson | La Plata, MO 63549 | $1,333,806 |
9 | Macon Atlanta State Bank ** | Macon, MO 63552 | $1,310,742 |
10 | James S Cross Revocable Trust | Callao, MO 63534 | $1,289,564 |
11 | Franklin D Bush | Macon, MO 63552 | $1,242,007 |
12 | Leroy Griffin Inc | Macon, MO 63552 | $1,216,556 |
13 | Larry Dean Grigsby | Elmer, MO 63538 | $1,055,482 |
14 | Gall Farms | New Cambria, MO 63558 | $1,023,433 |
15 | Kemper V Walker | Atlanta, MO 63530 | $1,015,227 |
16 | James L Britt | Callao, MO 63534 | $972,453 |
17 | Mary C Liebhart Rev Trust | New Boston, MO 63557 | $970,954 |
18 | Robert Dean Dawson | Bevier, MO 63532 | $952,937 |
19 | Ray Thomas Easley Jr | Elmer, MO 63538 | $940,863 |
20 | Randall Watson Rev Trust-watson Legacy Trust | Bevier, MO 63532 | $932,939 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>