Total Emergency Relief Program in Macon County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 108
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Macon County, Missouri totaled $2,356,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rival Properties | New Cambria, MO 63558 | $337,252 |
2 | Ronnie Dale Jackson Jr | New Boston, MO 63557 | $251,840 |
3 | Jason C Brand | Excello, MO 65247 | $181,688 |
4 | Cody Dale Jackson | New Boston, MO 63557 | $135,578 |
5 | Thomas Merrill Jones | Elmer, MO 63538 | $115,817 |
6 | M Castle Properties LLC | Callao, MO 63534 | $92,543 |
7 | Brian Jay Hilgendorf | Excello, MO 65247 | $79,964 |
8 | Samuel Clint Jones | Ethel, MO 63539 | $76,462 |
9 | Chariton Group | New Cambria, MO 63558 | $60,293 |
10 | Gall Farms | New Cambria, MO 63558 | $46,338 |
11 | Mcvickers Misty Valley Farms Inc | Bevier, MO 63532 | $43,286 |
12 | John Manning Greenwood | Anabel, MO 63431 | $43,133 |
13 | Rowe Farms LLC | New Cambria, MO 63558 | $40,723 |
14 | Kristin S Gall | New Cambria, MO 63558 | $40,569 |
15 | Hartung Bros Inc | Macon, MO 63552 | $40,336 |
16 | John Charles Hall | Callao, MO 63534 | $40,118 |
17 | Nathan Shain Ford | Callao, MO 63534 | $37,508 |
18 | Rick Schwieter | Macon, MO 63552 | $32,208 |
19 | Charles Tyler Hall | Callao, MO 63534 | $31,976 |
20 | Ryan T Almond | New Boston, MO 63557 | $31,200 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>