Conservation Reserve Program in Mercer County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 275
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Mercer County, Missouri totaled $2,145,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Patrick M Clark | Lawson, MO 64062 | $10,986 |
62 | Jack Clapham | Princeton, MO 64673 | $10,982 |
63 | Everett L Kenoyer Sr | Cumming, IA 50061 | $10,927 |
64 | Jamie Franek | Lonsdale, MN 55046 | $10,909 |
65 | Mark P Miles | Kearney, MO 64060 | $10,715 |
66 | Carole L Demoss- Revocable Living Trust Agreement | Princeton, MO 64673 | $10,658 |
67 | , | $10,643 | |
68 | Kenneth R Kelly And Jill L Kelly Revocable Living | Tulsa, OK 74114 | $10,549 |
69 | Patricia L Huebner | Moulton, IA 52572 | $10,374 |
70 | Robert Scott Banks | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $10,208 |
71 | Lund Farms LLC | Sherman, TX 75092 | $10,164 |
72 | Baugher Grain Farm Inc | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $10,034 |
73 | Kay A Denver | Saint Joseph, MO 64506 | $9,910 |
74 | Robert E Bittick Living Trust | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $9,850 |
75 | Inez Grace Bittick Family Trust | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $9,850 |
76 | Stephen W Moore | Princeton, MO 64673 | $9,802 |
77 | Jeffrey D Schmidt | Lake Crystal, MN 56055 | $9,696 |
78 | Rousse Investments LLC Peter J Rousse Sole Member | Cut Off, LA 70345 | $9,682 |
79 | Boyd E Torrey | Spickard, MO 64679 | $9,673 |
80 | Jerome A Herek | Amherst, WI 54406 | $8,983 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”