Farm Subsidy information
Mercer County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Mercer County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 392
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mercer County, Missouri totaled $5,530,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Jerome A Herek | Amherst, WI 54406 | $7,239 |
82 | Patricia L Huebner | Moulton, IA 52572 | $7,161 |
83 | Hsc Limited Liability Co | Smithville, MO 64089 | $7,119 |
84 | David J Bruynell | Pleasant Valley, MO 64068 | $7,117 |
85 | Thomas A Witterholt | Dubuque, IA 52001 | $7,087 |
86 | Max Eugene Coon | Mercer, MO 64661 | $7,085 |
87 | Robert & Gloria Gillespie Joint Trust | Grain Valley, MO 64029 | $7,049 |
88 | Ellsworth Farms Inc | Princeton, MO 64673 | $7,043 |
89 | David Prichard | Princeton, MO 64673 | $7,011 |
90 | Bradley Jr Vogel | Lineville, IA 50147 | $6,999 |
91 | Harley Jack Derry | Trenton, MO 64683 | $6,982 |
92 | Arnie Snook | Ankeny, IA 50021 | $6,979 |
93 | Carolyn L Stiegemeier | Saint Charles, MO 63304 | $6,972 |
94 | Bobbi Jolene Barron | Trenton, MO 64683 | $6,967 |
95 | Clint Allen Moore | Princeton, MO 64673 | $6,780 |
96 | Alva Mitchell | Bowie, MD 20715 | $6,701 |
97 | Mary M Padget | Odessa, MO 64076 | $6,692 |
98 | Michael D Gibson | Princeton, MO 64673 | $6,640 |
99 | Mitchell Gregory Reger | Princeton, MO 64673 | $6,611 |
100 | James R Clark | Mercer, MO 64661 | $6,578 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”