Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Mercer County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 282
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Mercer County, Missouri totaled $966,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Honey Creek Farms Inc | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $5,999 |
42 | Manville Farms | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $5,979 |
43 | Whitt Farms Inc | Princeton, MO 64673 | $5,583 |
44 | Gd & Rj Inc | Princeton, MO 64673 | $5,579 |
45 | Tony Dooley | Norborne, MO 64668 | $5,499 |
46 | Jonathan Adam Price | Princeton, MO 64673 | $5,448 |
47 | Jimmy Lee Shields | Lineville, IA 50147 | $5,357 |
48 | David Alex Nielson | Conception Junction, MO 64434 | $5,219 |
49 | John C Hamilton | Cainsville, MO 64632 | $5,143 |
50 | Michael Stiles | Princeton, MO 64673 | $5,138 |
51 | Donald Gene Parsons | Princeton, MO 64673 | $5,084 |
52 | Sjt Farms Inc | Richmond, MO 64085 | $5,070 |
53 | Djt Farms Inc | Richmond, MO 64085 | $5,067 |
54 | Robert L Puffer | Unionville, MO 63565 | $5,009 |
55 | Chance Flowers | Princeton, MO 64673 | $4,975 |
56 | James E Johnston | Mercer, MO 64661 | $4,925 |
57 | Raymond Dale Donelson | Princeton, MO 64673 | $4,914 |
58 | Wilbur Larason Revocable Living T | Mercer, MO 64661 | $4,770 |
59 | Kathryn A Upmeyer | Garner, IA 50438 | $4,738 |
60 | Patrick L Kimmis | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $4,507 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”