Deficiency Payment in Miller County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 62
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Miller County, Missouri totaled $48,957 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Gerhard W Kempker | Henley, MO 65040 | $5,977 |
2 | Harley C Vaughan Revocable Trust | Tuscumbia, MO 65082 | $4,079 |
3 | Lefever Family Revocable Trust | Tuscumbia, MO 65082 | $3,053 |
4 | Darrin Earl Tellman | Tuscumbia, MO 65082 | $2,958 |
5 | Jay Preston Fischer | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $2,631 |
6 | Robert Dickneite | Iberia, MO 65486 | $2,286 |
7 | Leonard & Marie Schanzmeyer Tr | Saint Elizabeth, MO 65075 | $1,970 |
8 | Robert J Oligschlaeger | Saint Elizabeth, MO 65075 | $1,787 |
9 | Anthony James Lueckenhoff | Saint Elizabeth, MO 65075 | $1,604 |
10 | Randy Tompkins | Eldon, MO 65026 | $1,410 |
11 | Roger Tompkins | Eldon, MO 65026 | $1,410 |
12 | Franklin Calton | Tuscumbia, MO 65082 | $1,207 |
13 | James Luebbering | Saint Thomas, MO 65076 | $1,187 |
14 | Melvin J Bax | Saint Elizabeth, MO 65075 | $1,021 |
15 | Evelyn M Kempker | Henley, MO 65040 | $963 |
16 | Ray Doerhoff | Saint Elizabeth, MO 65075 | $905 |
17 | Ralph Berendzen | Henley, MO 65040 | $855 |
18 | Robert Lueckenhoff | Saint Elizabeth, MO 65075 | $840 |
19 | Roy A Bear | Grandview, MO 64030 | $837 |
20 | David J Kliethermes | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $821 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>