Farm Subsidy information
Mississippi County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Mississippi County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 241
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mississippi County, Missouri totaled $8,881,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | M & M Ag Investments | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $14,910 |
42 | Alvin Lee Marcum | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $14,635 |
43 | Lankheit Family Farms, Inc. | Charleston, MO 63834 | $14,256 |
44 | James D Jernigan | Howey In The Hills, FL 34737 | $14,210 |
45 | Daphne J Jernigan | Howey In The Hills, FL 34737 | $14,210 |
46 | William Brian Dill | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $14,019 |
47 | Love Farms Inc | Germantown, TN 38138 | $13,234 |
48 | Floyd Delbert Stallings-floyd D Stallings Living T | Charleston, MO 63834 | $12,944 |
49 | Eleanor Susan Hequembourg | Charleston, MO 63834 | $12,675 |
50 | Mrm Farms Partnership | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $12,179 |
51 | J R Goodin Farms LLC | Bertrand, MO 63823 | $12,085 |
52 | B & F Farms Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $11,907 |
53 | Bayou Du Chein LLC | North Palm Beach, FL 33408 | $11,780 |
54 | Glen Ault Jr | Charleston, MO 63834 | $11,491 |
55 | Dan Duenne Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $11,436 |
56 | Lochhead Farms Inc | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $11,306 |
57 | Rushing River Farms LLC | Charleston, MO 63834 | $11,167 |
58 | Concord Farms Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $11,107 |
59 | Brad Finley Hequembourg | Charleston, MO 63834 | $11,022 |
60 | Jim Rolwing | Charleston, MO 63834 | $10,872 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”