Production Flexibility Program in Mississippi County, Missouri, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 960

Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Mississippi County, Missouri totaled $25,302,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Production Flexibility Program
1995-2023
41John Wilbur Lindsay Goodin JrCharleston, MO 63834$141,716
42John Albert Peters Jr Revocable TBertrand, MO 63823$141,425
43Deline & SonCharleston, MO 63834$140,129
44Mcdowell FarmsCharleston, MO 63834$132,822
45Mike Bryant Farms IncCharleston, MO 63834$131,781
46James E CullisonCharleston, MO 63834$130,711
47Ferrell FarmsCharleston, MO 63834$129,771
48Shew & Presson Farms IncCharleston, MO 63834$126,016
49Samuel M Barker Revocable LivingEast Prairie, MO 63845$125,988
50Stallings Farms IncCharleston, MO 63834$121,719
51Thurmond And ThurmondCharleston, MO 63834$117,486
52Bryant Dorena FarmsEast Prairie, MO 63845$117,038
53Russell BrosEast Prairie, MO 63845$115,726
54Sam E Story IncEast Prairie, MO 63845$115,590
55Fox Meadows IncCharleston, MO 63834$112,468
56Chris McclanahanCharleston, MO 63834$110,165
57Stephen McclanahanCharleston, MO 63834$110,164
58Stanley Craig SuttonCharleston, MO 63834$109,624
59David B Brewer Farms IncCharleston, MO 63834$109,623
60Gertrude R Jones Living TrustEast Prairie, MO 63845$109,603

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag