Total Conservation Programs in Mississippi County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 277
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Mississippi County, Missouri totaled $7,384,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Daphne J Jernigan | Howey In The Hills, FL 34737 | $28,420 |
62 | Farm Credit Southeast Missouri ** | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $28,420 |
63 | Wallace Reeves | Charleston, MO 63834 | $27,765 |
64 | C And D Glenn Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $26,380 |
65 | Byron Moxley & Son Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $26,311 |
66 | Andrew French Jr | Bertrand, MO 63823 | $25,069 |
67 | Hillhouse Farms Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $24,375 |
68 | Woodrow S Babb Jr Mrtl Tr | Bertrand, MO 63823 | $24,067 |
69 | Nancy G Heath Living Trust | Charleston, MO 63834 | $24,056 |
70 | Marjorie Arington Living Trust | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $24,052 |
71 | Kenny-kindle Living Kindle | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $24,025 |
72 | Norbert Rolwing Living Trust | Charleston, MO 63834 | $23,077 |
73 | Pamela O Williams | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $23,029 |
74 | Beasley Family Trust | Bertrand, MO 63823 | $22,916 |
75 | William B Moore Revocable Trust | Benton, MO 63736 | $22,894 |
76 | Floyd Delbert Stallings-floyd D Stallings Living T | Charleston, MO 63834 | $22,565 |
77 | B & F Farms Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $22,467 |
78 | James Carleton Moreton Living Tru | Charleston, MO 63834 | $22,019 |
79 | Randall V Arington Living Trust | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $21,710 |
80 | Dicky G Hanor Living Trust | Charleston, MO 63834 | $21,427 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”