Crop Disaster Assistance Program in Mississippi County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 463
Recipients of Crop Disaster Assistance Program from farms in Mississippi County, Missouri totaled $5,102,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Crop Disaster Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Paragon Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $217,461 |
2 | James A Clevenger | Bertrand, MO 63823 | $196,136 |
3 | Missouri Potato Co Inc | Saint Charles, IL 60175 | $176,368 |
4 | Franklin D Turnbo | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $167,083 |
5 | Jbs Farms Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $152,534 |
6 | Charles Moxley | Charleston, MO 63834 | $99,459 |
7 | Stephen Lankheit Farms | Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 | $96,587 |
8 | Fox Meadows Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $89,865 |
9 | Sowinski Farms Inc | Rhinelander, WI 54501 | $89,847 |
10 | Michael J Clevenger | Bonita Springs, FL 34135 | $85,316 |
11 | Rex Burney | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $84,550 |
12 | C Fray Morrow | Bertrand, MO 63823 | $82,114 |
13 | J J Black | Bonita Springs, FL 34135 | $79,862 |
14 | Stallings Potato Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $76,162 |
15 | Marshall Farms Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $69,140 |
16 | David E Barnett | Bertrand, MO 63823 | $60,009 |
17 | Mikel R Grider | Centertown, KY 42328 | $56,422 |
18 | Lankheit Family Farms, Inc. | Charleston, MO 63834 | $54,650 |
19 | Melton Anthony Wallace | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $53,145 |
20 | Dan Duenne Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $53,040 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>