Farm Subsidy information
Mississippi County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Mississippi County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 669
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mississippi County, Missouri totaled $13,169,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | R J S Burke Partnership | Charleston, MO 63834 | $72,299 |
| 22 | Jbs Farms Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $68,768 |
| 23 | Bone Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $66,398 |
| 24 | Eleanor Susan Hequembourg | Charleston, MO 63834 | $66,203 |
| 25 | Brad Finley Hequembourg | Charleston, MO 63834 | $66,200 |
| 26 | Byron Moxley & Son Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $62,766 |
| 27 | Shelby Fms Partnership | Charleston, MO 63834 | $62,610 |
| 28 | Daniel J Babb Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $62,333 |
| 29 | Ernest E Story Living Trust | Charleston, MO 63834 | $61,176 |
| 30 | Dan Duenne Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $59,736 |
| 31 | Black Bayou Properties LLC | Charleston, MO 63834 | $58,705 |
| 32 | Delouri Farms Inc | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $58,615 |
| 33 | Stanley Craig Sutton | Charleston, MO 63834 | $58,525 |
| 34 | Marshall Affiliates Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $54,431 |
| 35 | Robert Mark Renaud | Charleston, MO 63834 | $54,222 |
| 36 | Wolf Island Farms Inc | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $53,452 |
| 37 | C E Vowels & Co | Charleston, MO 63834 | $53,141 |
| 38 | Marshall Acres Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $52,484 |
| 39 | Big Oak Farms Inc | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $51,040 |
| 40 | Marshall Companies LLC | Charleston, MO 63834 | $50,273 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
