Farm Subsidy information
Mississippi County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Mississippi County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 160
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mississippi County, Missouri totaled $7,007,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hbr Ag | Charleston, MO 63834 | $86,586 |
2 | M & M Ag Investments | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $67,601 |
3 | J S P Farms | Bertrand, MO 63823 | $59,264 |
4 | Steve Jones Farm | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $30,726 |
5 | Farm Credit Southeast Missouri ** | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $28,420 |
6 | R J S Burke Partnership | Charleston, MO 63834 | $24,309 |
7 | Rushing River Partnership | Charleston, MO 63834 | $23,559 |
8 | Sisters Island Partnership | Germantown, TN 38138 | $20,196 |
9 | , | $16,490 | |
10 | Eleanor Susan Hequembourg | Charleston, MO 63834 | $16,050 |
11 | J R Goodin Farms LLC | Bertrand, MO 63823 | $15,701 |
12 | Focus Bank ** | Charleston, MO 63834 | $15,206 |
13 | , | $15,031 | |
14 | Lankheit Family Farms, Inc. | Charleston, MO 63834 | $13,823 |
15 | Bar I Cattle Farms LLC | Charleston, MO 63834 | $13,060 |
16 | Dan Duenne Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $12,231 |
17 | L Burke Dodson - Burke And Cherie Dodson Trust | Charleston, MO 63834 | $12,135 |
18 | Molly Dianne Morrow | Charleston, MO 63834 | $11,938 |
19 | B & F Farms Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $11,748 |
20 | Bayou Du Chein LLC | North Palm Beach, FL 33408 | $11,666 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>