Farm Subsidy information
Mississippi County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Mississippi County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,999
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mississippi County, Missouri totaled $320,007,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Focus Bank ** | Charleston, MO 63834 | $5,680,476 |
| 2 | Burke Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $4,124,667 |
| 3 | R J S Burke Partnership | Charleston, MO 63834 | $3,720,221 |
| 4 | M & M Ag Investments | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $3,667,393 |
| 5 | Mrm Farms Partnership | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $3,511,775 |
| 6 | Stallings Brothers | Charleston, MO 63834 | $3,142,030 |
| 7 | Moreton Partnership | Charleston, MO 63834 | $2,733,991 |
| 8 | J S P Farms | Bertrand, MO 63823 | $2,326,731 |
| 9 | Marshall Farms Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $2,284,525 |
| 10 | Barnett Farms Inc | Bertrand, MO 63823 | $2,171,933 |
| 11 | Wolf Island Farms Inc | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $2,046,614 |
| 12 | C And D Glenn Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $2,021,208 |
| 13 | Burke Bros & Co Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $1,851,995 |
| 14 | Abc Farms Inc | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $1,774,049 |
| 15 | Brad Finley Hequembourg | Charleston, MO 63834 | $1,768,542 |
| 16 | Glenn Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $1,716,887 |
| 17 | Bone Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $1,693,162 |
| 18 | Mt Level Farms Co Inc | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $1,636,909 |
| 19 | Dan Duenne Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $1,607,107 |
| 20 | Jbs Farms Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $1,603,510 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
