Total Emergency Relief Program in Mississippi County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 76
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Mississippi County, Missouri totaled $336,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hbr Ag | Charleston, MO 63834 | $33,670 |
2 | J S P Farms | Bertrand, MO 63823 | $27,973 |
3 | M & M Ag Investments | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $21,323 |
4 | Monica Horton Goodin | Charleston, MO 63834 | $11,093 |
5 | Mrm Farms Partnership | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $10,656 |
6 | J R Goodin Farms LLC | Bertrand, MO 63823 | $9,269 |
7 | Jbs Farms Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $8,553 |
8 | William Brian Dill | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $7,859 |
9 | Stephen & Janette Story Farms Inc | College Station, TX 77845 | $7,256 |
10 | Alvin Lee Marcum | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $7,074 |
11 | Steve Jones Farm | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $6,412 |
12 | Redbud Farms LLC | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $6,313 |
13 | R J S Burke Partnership | Charleston, MO 63834 | $6,225 |
14 | Kasey Wayne Jones | Bertrand, MO 63823 | $6,125 |
15 | Double H Family Farms LLC | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $5,789 |
16 | C & A Marcum Farms LLC | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $5,784 |
17 | Elnora Loretta Peters Revocable Trust | Bertrand, MO 63823 | $5,744 |
18 | , | $5,726 | |
19 | Charles Lucas Sutton | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $5,674 |
20 | Thomas Raffety Farms Inc | Wyatt, MO 63882 | $5,489 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>