Total Commodity Programs in Mississippi County, Missouri, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,932

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Mississippi County, Missouri totaled $221,046,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
21Dan Duenne FarmsCharleston, MO 63834$1,460,578
22Eleanor Susan HequembourgCharleston, MO 63834$1,458,143
23B & R Arington Farms LLCEast Prairie, MO 63845$1,443,030
24Shelby Fms PartnershipCharleston, MO 63834$1,410,665
25Shew & Presson Farms IncCharleston, MO 63834$1,360,937
26Jbs Farms IncCharleston, MO 63834$1,329,785
27George C ShelbyCharleston, MO 63834$1,278,254
28Daniel J Babb FarmsCharleston, MO 63834$1,272,036
29Stanley Craig SuttonCharleston, MO 63834$1,210,221
30Mike Bryant Farms IncCharleston, MO 63834$1,201,542
31Marshall Affiliates IncCharleston, MO 63834$1,192,280
32Sevic FarmsCharleston, MO 63834$1,168,300
33Sam E Story IncEast Prairie, MO 63845$1,164,570
34Ernest E Story Living TrustCharleston, MO 63834$1,149,022
35Mcivan Jones Farms IncEast Prairie, MO 63845$1,135,349
36T & S FarmsCharleston, MO 63834$1,132,822
37John G Waggener Jr Living Trust Dated 05/16/2006Cape Girardeau, MO 63701$1,106,746
38Lester L MooreEast Prairie, MO 63845$1,084,462
39David Mcdowell Dba Mcdowell FarmsCharleston, MO 63834$1,078,806
40Steve Jones FarmEast Prairie, MO 63845$1,077,637

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag