Farm Subsidy information
Moniteau County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Moniteau County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 540
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Moniteau County, Missouri totaled $6,905,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Mark Rohrbach | California, MO 65018 | $11,886 |
102 | John Allen Ramer | Russellville, MO 65074 | $11,573 |
103 | Krista Danielle Baquet | Clarksburg, MO 65025 | $11,474 |
104 | Jimmy D Langkop | California, MO 65018 | $11,409 |
105 | Daniel F Linhardt | Russellville, MO 65074 | $11,399 |
106 | Gump Family Farms LLC | California, MO 65018 | $11,346 |
107 | Drew Braden Bolinger | California, MO 65018 | $11,278 |
108 | James Christopher Swearingen | Clarksburg, MO 65025 | $11,241 |
109 | Debra Porter | California, MO 65018 | $11,078 |
110 | Dixie K Taggart | California, MO 65018 | $10,995 |
111 | Mark Bolinger | California, MO 65018 | $10,860 |
112 | E Eugene Cook | California, MO 65018 | $10,824 |
113 | Allee Farms LLC | California, MO 65018 | $10,811 |
114 | Darrell Schultz | Latham, MO 65050 | $10,577 |
115 | Ken-mar Farms Inc | Latham, MO 65050 | $10,464 |
116 | Bsa Trust C/o William Loesch | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $10,432 |
117 | Kenneth R Wolken | California, MO 65018 | $10,426 |
118 | Douglas John Strein | Jamestown, MO 65046 | $10,315 |
119 | Jeremy Burger | California, MO 65018 | $10,202 |
120 | , | $10,192 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”