Conservation Reserve Program in Moniteau County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 539
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Moniteau County, Missouri totaled $18,128,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Wayne Muri | Jamestown, MO 65046 | $193,587 |
22 | Donald Deane Yoest | Tipton, MO 65081 | $189,498 |
23 | Joseph F Oligschlaeger | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $188,981 |
24 | Charles F And Viola T Luebbert Re | Tipton, MO 65081 | $184,643 |
25 | Larry Imhoff | Jamestown, MO 65046 | $181,604 |
26 | Frederick F And Marilyn Koechner | Tipton, MO 65081 | $181,080 |
27 | Lori Raithel | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $169,064 |
28 | Donna Sue Meiners | Lees Summit, MO 64064 | $163,537 |
29 | Jason R Hays | Tipton, MO 65081 | $163,508 |
30 | Robert L Huhmann | Tipton, MO 65081 | $154,108 |
31 | Glenda L Hainen | Tipton, MO 65081 | $152,366 |
32 | Douglas John Strein | Jamestown, MO 65046 | $145,597 |
33 | Walter Groth | Versailles, MO 65084 | $144,004 |
34 | Cpw Partnership Lp | Columbia, MO 65205 | $141,053 |
35 | Dean Kasper | Tipton, MO 65081 | $137,765 |
36 | Triple P Farms | California, MO 65018 | $133,485 |
37 | The B&r Lehmann Family Trust | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $128,910 |
38 | Donald R Bracht | Tipton, MO 65081 | $124,766 |
39 | Schoeneberg Irrevocable Trust % S | California, MO 65018 | $122,891 |
40 | Viola F Meyer | Tipton, MO 65081 | $121,482 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”