Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Monroe County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 241
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Monroe County, Missouri totaled $8,291,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Wright Bros Farms Inc | Madison, MO 65263 | $66,812 |
42 | Barry Nordwald | Paris, MO 65275 | $63,573 |
43 | K-o-k Hog Farm Inc | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $63,465 |
44 | Edward Russell Vitt | Paris, MO 65275 | $63,040 |
45 | Allan L Wilt | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $61,337 |
46 | David Lynn Krusemark | Madison, MO 65263 | $61,111 |
47 | Alan Lee Decker | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $59,331 |
48 | Anthony Hays Revocable Trust | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $56,659 |
49 | Jeanne Stephens Lee Enter Inc | Washington, DC 20007 | $56,375 |
50 | James D Yates | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $53,628 |
51 | John L Yates | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $53,628 |
52 | Brent D Morgan | Madison, MO 65263 | $53,566 |
53 | Millard Farms Inc | Perry, MO 63462 | $47,911 |
54 | Melissa Raye Vitt | Paris, MO 65275 | $46,236 |
55 | Paul R Hays | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $44,288 |
56 | Carl Ensor Farms Inc | Holliday, MO 65258 | $43,757 |
57 | Sidney R Threlkeld Revocable Living Trust Indentur | Paris, MO 65275 | $40,597 |
58 | Stephen G Yates | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $39,941 |
59 | Poore Farms Inc | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $38,416 |
60 | Greg Arnold Long | Paris, MO 65275 | $38,013 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”