Production Flexibility Program in Monroe County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,361
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Monroe County, Missouri totaled $15,505,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | James Richard Legrand | Madison, MO 65263 | $47,444 |
82 | Larry Gene Bounds | Paris, MO 65275 | $45,659 |
83 | Glenn Edward Vaughn | Paris, MO 65275 | $44,533 |
84 | Owen Dale Sparks | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $44,404 |
85 | Julius Larrick | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $44,193 |
86 | Fred Blades | Holliday, MO 65258 | $44,024 |
87 | Wheaton Farms Inc | Paris, MO 65275 | $43,849 |
88 | H David Currence Heritage Trust | Osage Beach, MO 65065 | $43,674 |
89 | Robert J Lueken | Madison, MO 65263 | $43,365 |
90 | Ralph Windmann | Mexico, MO 65265 | $42,986 |
91 | Estate Of Brian Matthew Flatt | Centralia, MO 65240 | $42,644 |
92 | Glennon Buckman | Paris, MO 65275 | $42,350 |
93 | Scott Mclaughlin | Perry, MO 63462 | $41,663 |
94 | Richard Thomas | Madison, MO 65263 | $40,796 |
95 | Robert Hatton | Stoutsville, MO 65283 | $40,562 |
96 | Tracy L Morgan | Madison, MO 65263 | $40,506 |
97 | Philip Saunders | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $40,097 |
98 | Darrell Miller | Paris, MO 65275 | $39,753 |
99 | Jerel Lee Holohan | Centralia, MO 65240 | $39,530 |
100 | Dye Brothers Partnership | Paris, MO 65275 | $38,948 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”