Farm Subsidy information
Monroe County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Monroe County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 547
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Monroe County, Missouri totaled $12,391,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Juanita L Pfanner Revocable Living Trust | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $11,770 |
102 | Robert M Nichols | Madison, MO 65263 | $11,739 |
103 | James Slaton | Madison, MO 65263 | $11,651 |
104 | Paul Eugene Norman Jr | Perry, MO 63462 | $11,607 |
105 | Andrew Baldridge | Kirkwood, MO 63122 | $11,533 |
106 | Daniel Everett Eckman | Paris, MO 65275 | $11,457 |
107 | Tim Harrison | Holliday, MO 65258 | $11,332 |
108 | Daniel J Schaub | Chesterfield, MO 63017 | $11,263 |
109 | Harry D Bozoian | Columbia, MO 65203 | $11,055 |
110 | Jon-jon Barnes And Pam Barnes Rev Lvng T Barnes | Center, MO 63436 | $11,052 |
111 | Charles Lee Anderson | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $10,992 |
112 | Ladonna Vitt Revocable Trust | Paris, MO 65275 | $10,847 |
113 | Althaven LLC | Columbia, MO 65201 | $10,731 |
114 | Normo Farms LLC | Washington, MO 63090 | $10,624 |
115 | John W Ross | Paris, MO 65275 | $10,619 |
116 | Dennis Stuart | Perry, MO 63462 | $10,534 |
117 | Joe Bodine | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $10,469 |
118 | T & J Sachs Farms Lp | Flinthill, MO 63346 | $10,313 |
119 | Aubuchon Madison LLC | Old Monroe, MO 63369 | $10,118 |
120 | David Harmon | Manchester, MO 63021 | $10,033 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”