Total Conservation Programs in Montgomery County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 102
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Montgomery County, Missouri totaled $432,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Miller Joint Rev Trust | New Florence, MO 63363 | $50,031 |
2 | , | $29,348 | |
3 | Phyllis Reagan | Montgomery City, MO 63361 | $25,159 |
4 | Teresa-thomas Family Thomas | Middletown, MO 63359 | $21,911 |
5 | Barbara Welschmeyer Rev Trust | Wellsville, MO 63384 | $17,360 |
6 | , | $14,045 | |
7 | , | $12,816 | |
8 | Herbert Lee Cochran Rev Trust | Middletown, MO 63359 | $11,037 |
9 | Virginia M Daugherty | Hazelwood, MO 63042 | $9,036 |
10 | Barbara Miller Rev Trust | Montgomery City, MO 63361 | $8,818 |
11 | John R Mudd Revocable Trust | Hermann, MO 65041 | $8,348 |
12 | Angelo A Speno Jr - Speno Family Rev Trust | Dunedin, FL 34697 | $7,772 |
13 | Nena Bybee | Wellsville, MO 63384 | $7,529 |
14 | Graham Cave Farms Inc | Montgomery City, MO 63361 | $7,398 |
15 | Brent Sheets | Wellsville, MO 63384 | $7,165 |
16 | Tracy Ballew | Montgomery City, MO 63361 | $6,697 |
17 | Robert Jordan Ridgley | New Florence, MO 63363 | $6,479 |
18 | Stephen J Rothermel | Fenton, MO 63026 | $6,468 |
19 | Kenley Alan Schmidt | Montgomery City, MO 63361 | $5,827 |
20 | Engemann Brothers Farms LLC | Rhineland, MO 65069 | $5,739 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>