Total Emergency Relief Program in New Madrid County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 194
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $3,543,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Grm Farms | Bernie, MO 63822 | $231,825 |
2 | Julie L Aycock | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $176,446 |
3 | Bobby Howell Aycock Jr | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $140,896 |
4 | Drew Michael Murphy | Malden, MO 63863 | $137,861 |
5 | William Alexander Odom | Kennett, MO 63857 | $125,000 |
6 | Taylor Farms | Lilbourn, MO 63862 | $117,731 |
7 | Tim Murphy Farms LLC | Bernie, MO 63822 | $115,074 |
8 | Trey Lawfield Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $95,992 |
9 | Jarrett Lawfield Farms | Kewanee, MO 63860 | $95,424 |
10 | Hoggard Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $91,202 |
11 | Katie Nichole Walters | Dexter, MO 63841 | $73,012 |
12 | Donnie Underwood Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $72,930 |
13 | Gardner & Gardner Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $71,640 |
14 | , | $69,686 | |
15 | Kevin Carlisle Farms | Lilbourn, MO 63862 | $66,134 |
16 | Murphy Cotton LLC | Bernie, MO 63822 | $65,362 |
17 | Martin Grain Co Inc | Bernie, MO 63822 | $65,220 |
18 | Ling Farms LLC | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $62,046 |
19 | Micca Elaine Burnett | Campbell, MO 63933 | $56,686 |
20 | Daniel Austin Eddy | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $56,333 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>