Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in New Madrid County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 807
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $7,067,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Chris & Tina Porter Farms | Essex, MO 63846 | $55,962 |
22 | Pearson Farms | Matthews, MO 63867 | $54,900 |
23 | Trey Lawfield Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $54,070 |
24 | Jarrett Lawfield Farms | Kewanee, MO 63860 | $53,982 |
25 | B & C Klipfel Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $51,559 |
26 | Larry Bradfield Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $51,459 |
27 | Taylor Farms | Lilbourn, MO 63862 | $51,180 |
28 | Jw Sullenger Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $50,263 |
29 | Bobby Howell Aycock Jr | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $50,139 |
30 | Julie L Aycock | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $50,137 |
31 | Jacob Allan Woolverton | Gideon, MO 63848 | $49,148 |
32 | Steve Parker Farms LLC | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $48,190 |
33 | Ricky Parker Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $48,188 |
34 | Martin & Karen Smelser Farms | Catron, MO 63833 | $47,723 |
35 | Two B Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $46,605 |
36 | Steve & Lynn Kellams Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $46,407 |
37 | Rost & Rost Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $45,408 |
38 | First Missouri Bank Of Semo ** | Kennett, MO 63857 | $44,592 |
39 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $44,402 |
40 | Kevin Carlisle Farms | Lilbourn, MO 63862 | $42,773 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”