Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in New Madrid County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 76
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $433,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Drew Michael Murphy | Malden, MO 63863 | $7,959 |
22 | Micca Elaine Burnett | Campbell, MO 63933 | $7,828 |
23 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $7,258 |
24 | Cindy Minehart | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $6,517 |
25 | Stephanie J Earnheart | Malden, MO 63863 | $5,740 |
26 | David Eddy Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $5,078 |
27 | Denver And Cheryl Wolford Farms | Matthews, MO 63867 | $4,534 |
28 | Danny Whitten Farms | Matthews, MO 63867 | $4,254 |
29 | Taylor Lynn Bradfield | Portageville, MO 63873 | $4,162 |
30 | Wanda Underwood Trust | Portageville, MO 63873 | $4,035 |
31 | Donald F Underwood Sr Residuary Tr U-a-d 3-09-2005 | Portageville, MO 63873 | $3,830 |
32 | Wilkinson Investments, LLC | Forsyth, IL 62535 | $3,606 |
33 | Dean And Kathie Stevens Farms LLC | Malden, MO 63863 | $3,108 |
34 | , | $3,089 | |
35 | Jacob Gaylon Mccurry Knapp | Gideon, MO 63848 | $3,034 |
36 | , | $2,739 | |
37 | , | $2,562 | |
38 | Josh Underwood | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $2,407 |
39 | Priscilla Beth Enos | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $2,372 |
40 | Toni Lynne Lawfield | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $1,818 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”