Non-insured Disaster Assistance in New Madrid County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 79
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $544,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert A Lavalle Dba Delta Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $6,811 |
22 | Henry Brands | Portageville, MO 63873 | $6,538 |
23 | Lfj Family Farm | Kewanee, MO 63860 | $6,536 |
24 | Jon Gregory Delisle | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $6,300 |
25 | Mark Baker | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $6,300 |
26 | Eric Eftink | Brighton, TN 38011 | $6,188 |
27 | Virginia L James | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $5,740 |
28 | Elizabeth James | No Town, MO 11111 | $5,713 |
29 | Albert C Riley 2nd Trust | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $4,913 |
30 | Lewis Riley Trust | Lilbourn, MO 63862 | $4,693 |
31 | William Leslie Henry | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $4,041 |
32 | John Lavalle | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $4,017 |
33 | Thomas W Lawfield III | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $3,761 |
34 | Albert Riley James | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $3,336 |
35 | Don & Myra Rone Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $3,080 |
36 | Mike & Mary Rone Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $3,080 |
37 | Charles & Ella Lavalle | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $2,971 |
38 | Oneal Wimberley Sr | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $2,794 |
39 | Robert Eftink | Portageville, MO 63873 | $2,694 |
40 | E J Marks | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $2,410 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”