Farm Subsidy information
New Madrid County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in New Madrid County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 251
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $12,110,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kelli Leigh Bradfield | Portageville, MO 63873 | $27,998 |
22 | Riley Enterprises Inc | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $27,675 |
23 | Lewis Riley Trust | Smithville, TN 37166 | $27,329 |
24 | John Paul Wescoat & Theresa M Wescoat | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $27,009 |
25 | Jason E Cope Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $26,456 |
26 | Larry Bradfield Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $26,090 |
27 | Dewitt Revocable Living Trust | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $23,667 |
28 | Double R Farming Partnership | Dexter, MO 63841 | $23,016 |
29 | Chris & Tina Porter Farms | Essex, MO 63846 | $22,295 |
30 | Murphy Cotton LLC | Bernie, MO 63822 | $21,719 |
31 | Oscar Sapp Farms | Parma, MO 63870 | $21,392 |
32 | Gardner & Gardner Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $21,362 |
33 | , | $18,673 | |
34 | Jacob Allan Woolverton | Gideon, MO 63848 | $18,490 |
35 | Steve & Lynn Kellams Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $18,250 |
36 | Christopher Toby Bradfield | Portageville, MO 63873 | $17,997 |
37 | Alsobrook Newbauer Farms Inc | Memphis, TN 38120 | $17,275 |
38 | Valco Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $17,274 |
39 | , | $16,712 | |
40 | Mcroberts Farm Semo LLC | Columbia, MO 65201 | $16,103 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”