Commodity Certificates in New Madrid County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 601
Recipients of Commodity Certificates from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $24,240,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Commodity Certificates 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jason E Cope Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $238,489 |
22 | Priggel Family Farms Inc | Portageville, MO 63873 | $220,091 |
23 | Neudorf Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $213,136 |
24 | Charles Anthony Beis III | Portageville, MO 63873 | $208,127 |
25 | Dewain Fullerton Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $206,238 |
26 | Bob Grissom Farms | Gideon, MO 63848 | $205,480 |
27 | Barry Richardson Sr | Marston, MO 63866 | $203,388 |
28 | Mark Joseph Brands | Portageville, MO 63873 | $202,379 |
29 | Wallace M Kellams Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $197,870 |
30 | Charles A Beis Jr | Portageville, MO 63873 | $195,621 |
31 | J & M Priggel Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $193,205 |
32 | Lange Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $183,740 |
33 | Ben Johnson | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $179,998 |
34 | Fletchers Gin Inc | Gideon, MO 63848 | $178,679 |
35 | Gerald Woolverton Revocable Livin | Malden, MO 63863 | $178,668 |
36 | Larry W Spencer | Portageville, MO 63873 | $174,657 |
37 | Jack Tolbert | Gideon, MO 63848 | $173,592 |
38 | Brown Brothers Farms | Kennett, MO 63857 | $169,479 |
39 | Steve Branch | Gideon, MO 63848 | $161,116 |
40 | Randle David Lemings | Malden, MO 63863 | $151,704 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”