Deficiency Payment in New Madrid County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,212
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $4,924,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert Riley & Sons | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $36,774 |
22 | Chris Wilson | Portageville, MO 63873 | $36,520 |
23 | Robert Fowler | Fort Myers, FL 33919 | $36,461 |
24 | E B Gee Jr | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $36,267 |
25 | Neal Ross | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $35,510 |
26 | Gail Thomas Gee Trust | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $35,305 |
27 | Raymond Terry Blair | Essex, MO 63846 | $35,078 |
28 | Alex Fowler | Lilbourn, MO 63862 | $32,888 |
29 | Robert A Lavalle Dba Delta Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $31,642 |
30 | David M Barton Farms Inc | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $31,497 |
31 | Mary Lou Medlin | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $31,369 |
32 | Bill Turner | Gideon, MO 63848 | $31,222 |
33 | Timothy Farrenburg | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $30,606 |
34 | Southern Grain & Milling | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $30,374 |
35 | Henry George Retz | Catron, MO 63833 | $30,022 |
36 | T W Medlin Farms Inc | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $29,935 |
37 | Michael Geske | Matthews, MO 63867 | $29,852 |
38 | Richard Burnett | Parma, MO 63870 | $29,456 |
39 | John Burnett | Parma, MO 63870 | $29,454 |
40 | Daniel Farrenburg | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $29,123 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”